Substack vs Medium: Which Is Better for Writers and Publishers in 2024?

Published

substack vs medium which is better for writers and publishers
Table of Contents

The debate over Substack vs Medium which is better for writers and publishers has never been more relevant. While Medium thrives as a curated hub for long-form journalism and niche expertise, Substack has emerged as the go-to platform for writers seeking direct reader relationships and revenue independence. The choice isn’t just about where to publish—it’s about defining the terms of engagement with your audience, controlling distribution, and structuring financial returns.

Medium’s polished, algorithm-driven ecosystem attracts readers who value polished prose and discovery through its recommendation engine. Yet, its revenue-sharing model leaves writers with limited control over pricing and audience retention. Substack, conversely, offers writers full ownership of their subscriber base, direct monetization, and a more intimate connection with readers—at the cost of organic discoverability. The tension between these platforms mirrors broader shifts in digital publishing: centralized discovery versus decentralized ownership.

For publishers eyeing long-term sustainability, the decision hinges on whether they prioritize scalability (Medium) or autonomy (Substack). The platforms cater to different philosophies of writing: one as a public square, the other as a private club. Understanding these dynamics is critical for writers who refuse to be constrained by platform algorithms or publishers who demand creative control.

substack vs medium which is better for writers and publishers

The Complete Overview of Substack vs Medium Which Is Better for Writers and Publishers

Substack and Medium represent two distinct paradigms in digital publishing. Medium, launched in 2012 by Evan Williams (co-founder of Twitter), positions itself as a "publication for serious ideas." Its strength lies in its built-in audience of millions, curated through an AI-driven recommendation system that surfaces high-quality content. Writers earn revenue via Medium’s Partner Program, which pays based on reader engagement, but the platform retains control over pricing and distribution. This model suits writers who prioritize reach over revenue per reader.

Substack, founded in 2017 by Chris Best and Hamish McKenzie, takes a different approach. It allows writers to build their own subscriber-based newsletters, monetizing through paid subscriptions. The platform’s appeal lies in its simplicity and direct monetization—writers keep 90% of subscription revenue (after payment processing fees) and own their audience data. This model aligns with the rise of "creator economies," where writers and publishers monetize through loyal, paying readers rather than ad revenue or algorithmic exposure.

The core difference between the two platforms is control. Medium offers discovery and a built-in audience but limits financial upside and editorial autonomy. Substack prioritizes ownership—of subscribers, revenue, and content—while demanding writers drive their own growth. For publishers, this translates to a choice between leveraging an existing ecosystem (Medium) or building one from scratch (Substack).

Historical Background and Evolution

Medium’s trajectory reflects the evolution of digital publishing as a collaborative, algorithm-driven space. Initially conceived as a "better blogging platform," it quickly pivoted to a curated publication model, attracting high-profile contributors like Maria Popova and Tim Ferriss. The introduction of the Partner Program in 2017 marked a shift toward monetization, though writers remain dependent on Medium’s traffic and revenue-sharing terms. Over time, the platform has doubled down on its "public square" identity, emphasizing community-driven discovery over individual ownership.

Substack’s origins are rooted in the frustration of independent writers and publishers who sought alternatives to social media’s ephemeral attention economy. The platform’s rise coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, when remote work and digital consumption surged. Substack’s simplicity—allowing writers to publish newsletters, charge subscriptions, and retain subscriber emails—proved irresistible. High-profile migrations from Medium to Substack (e.g., The New York Times’s The Daily, The Atlantic’s CityLab) underscored its appeal to established media brands. Today, Substack hosts over 3 million newsletters, with some generating millions annually.

The platforms’ histories reveal contrasting philosophies: Medium as a democratized publication space and Substack as a tool for decentralized media ownership. While Medium’s growth reflects the allure of scale, Substack’s success hinges on the value of direct reader relationships in an era of ad-blocking and privacy-conscious audiences.

Core Mechanisms: How It Works

Medium operates on a dual revenue model: reader subscriptions and the Partner Program. Readers pay a monthly fee (e.g., $5–$10) for access to all content, while writers earn based on reader time spent and claps (likes). The platform’s recommendation algorithm surfaces popular articles, but writers have no control over how their content is distributed or monetized. This lack of transparency has led to criticism, particularly as Medium’s revenue-sharing rates have fluctuated (currently 80% for writers, down from 90% in 2021).

Substack’s mechanics are straightforward: writers create a newsletter, readers subscribe via email, and payments flow directly to the writer. The platform charges a 10% fee (or 5% for annual billing), with the rest going to the creator. Writers can offer free and paid tiers, integrate third-party tools (e.g., Patreon, Ko-fi), and export subscriber lists. This transparency extends to analytics—writers see open rates, clicks, and revenue—empowering data-driven decisions. The trade-off is that growth relies entirely on the writer’s marketing efforts, with no built-in audience.

The key distinction lies in monetization autonomy. Medium’s model rewards engagement but dilutes individual earnings, while Substack’s direct payments incentivize writers to cultivate loyal, paying audiences. For publishers, this translates to a choice between algorithmic exposure (Medium) and ownership-driven revenue (Substack).

Key Benefits and Crucial Impact

The choice between Substack vs Medium which is better for writers and publishers ultimately depends on whether you prioritize reach or revenue. Medium’s strength lies in its ability to surface content to a passive audience, making it ideal for writers seeking visibility without the burden of audience acquisition. The platform’s recommendation engine ensures that well-written, engaging pieces can reach thousands of readers overnight. However, this comes at the cost of limited control—writers cannot set subscription prices, exclude non-paying readers, or retain subscriber data long-term.

Substack, by contrast, empowers writers to monetize their expertise directly. The platform’s simplicity—no ads, no middlemen—aligns with the growing demand for ad-free, high-quality content. Writers can experiment with pricing, offer exclusive content, and build a community around their work. This model is particularly appealing to publishers who view their audience as a product, not just a metric. The downside? Discoverability is nonexistent without external promotion. A Substack newsletter thrives only if its creator actively markets it, whether through social media, SEO, or email lists.

The impact of these models extends beyond individual writers. Medium’s approach reflects the broader trend of platform consolidation, where audiences are funneled into walled gardens controlled by algorithms. Substack, meanwhile, embodies the decentralized future of publishing, where creators retain ownership and readers pay for value. For publishers, this dichotomy raises critical questions: Should they invest in building their own audience (Substack) or leverage an existing one (Medium)?

"The internet gave us the tools to publish freely, but the real challenge is monetizing that freedom without surrendering control." — Maria Popova, Brain Pickings

Major Advantages

  • Monetization Control: Substack allows writers to set subscription prices, offer free tiers, and keep 90% of revenue. Medium’s Partner Program pays based on engagement, with rates subject to change.
  • Audience Ownership: Substack provides subscriber emails and analytics, enabling direct communication. Medium does not allow email exports or direct subscriber access.
  • Discoverability: Medium’s algorithm surfaces content to millions of readers. Substack relies on writers to drive traffic through external channels.
  • Flexibility: Substack supports integrations (e.g., Patreon, Memberful) and custom domains. Medium restricts customization to its own branding.
  • Revenue Potential: High-traffic Substack newsletters (e.g., The Morning Post, Stratechery) earn millions annually. Medium’s top earners (e.g., The Marginalian) rely on ad revenue and sponsorships.

substack vs medium which is better for writers and publishers - Ilustrasi 2

Comparative Analysis

Feature Substack Medium
Monetization Model Paid subscriptions (90% revenue share) Partner Program (80% revenue share, ad-based)
Audience Ownership Full control (email exports, analytics) No access (Medium retains subscriber data)
Discoverability None (organic growth required) High (algorithm-driven recommendations)
Content Customization Custom domains, integrations (Patreon, etc.) Limited to Medium’s platform
The landscape of Substack vs Medium which is better for writers and publishers is evolving rapidly, with both platforms adapting to shifting reader behaviors. Medium is increasingly focusing on corporate and institutional publishing, offering tools for brands to distribute thought leadership. Meanwhile, Substack is expanding into audio and video content, recognizing that writers can monetize beyond text. The rise of AI-generated content also poses challenges: Medium’s algorithm may struggle to distinguish between human and machine-written pieces, while Substack’s subscription model could incentivize high-quality, original work.

Emerging trends suggest a convergence of the two models. Platforms like Ghost and Mirror are offering hybrid solutions—combining Medium’s discoverability with Substack’s monetization. Additionally, the decline of third-party cookies and privacy regulations may push writers toward Substack’s first-party data advantages. For publishers, the future lies in diversifying revenue streams: leveraging Medium for reach while using Substack for direct monetization.

substack vs medium which is better for writers and publishers - Ilustrasi 3

Conclusion

The debate over Substack vs Medium which is better for writers and publishers is not about superiority but about alignment with your goals. Medium remains the optimal choice for writers who prioritize passive reach and engagement-driven earnings, while Substack suits those who value ownership, direct monetization, and long-term audience relationships. Publishers must weigh the trade-offs: the scalability of Medium against the autonomy of Substack.

Ultimately, the best platform depends on your relationship with your audience. If you thrive on algorithmic exposure and don’t mind sharing revenue, Medium offers a turnkey solution. If you’re willing to invest in audience-building and demand financial independence, Substack provides the tools to own your publishing destiny. The future of digital writing lies in recognizing that no single platform can offer everything—success may require a strategic blend of both.

Comprehensive FAQs

Q: Can I migrate my Substack audience to Medium or vice versa?

A: Substack allows email exports, enabling you to import subscribers into other platforms (e.g., Mailchimp, ConvertKit) for migration. Medium does not provide subscriber data, making cross-platform transfers difficult. Writers often rebuild audiences on Medium from scratch.

Q: Which platform pays writers more on average?

A: Substack writers typically earn higher per-subscriber revenue due to direct payments (e.g., $5–$50/month per reader). Medium’s Partner Program pays based on engagement, with top earners averaging $0.01–$0.05 per reader minute. Substack’s model scales better for niche audiences.

Q: Does Medium allow paid subscriptions?

A: No. Medium’s revenue model relies on reader subscriptions (e.g., $5/month for access) and the Partner Program. Writers cannot charge directly for their content. Substack, by contrast, supports tiered paid newsletters.

Q: Can I use both Substack and Medium simultaneously?

A: Yes. Many writers publish on both platforms, using Medium for reach and Substack for monetization. However, cross-posting requires manual effort, as Medium does not integrate with Substack’s newsletter tools.

Q: Which platform is better for beginners?

A: Medium is ideal for beginners due to its built-in audience and lower barrier to entry. Substack requires upfront effort in audience acquisition but offers greater long-term control. Beginners should start on Medium to test content before transitioning to Substack.

Q: How do I maximize earnings on Substack?

A: Focus on niche topics, offer exclusive content (e.g., deep dives, early access), and promote via social media, SEO, and collaborations. High-conversion newsletters (e.g., The Morning Post) combine free and paid tiers to attract and retain subscribers.

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Climate Columbia News.